Robert Samuelson leaves me banging my head


Robert Samuelson is normally a careful analytical columnist. But today's column in the Washington Post is ridiculous. It's about deregulation of electric utilities, and he's basically for it despite the anticompetitive, manipulative actions of energy companies.

Whatever the sins of Enron and others in California, politicians and regulators committed the greatest blunders. Here's a short list: (a) Approval was slow for new plants, creating an electricity shortage; (b) as wholesale electricity rates rose, state regulators insulated consumers from the increases (this worsened the shortage, because low rates stimulated demand); and (c) the state's major utilities, forced to buy electricity from independent power producers, couldn't sign long-term contracts and had to pay rising daily prices. Absent all the errors, the crisis wouldn't have occurred.

Approval was no slower for California than it was for any other densly populated area. And as for the "regulation" that remained that he mentions in (b) and (c), these were laws that the energy companies wrote! These were pushed through by a bipartisan majority bought and paid for by the big energy companies. And when they got them passed, then companies like Enron used market manipulations like "Death Star" and "Get Shorty" to hold California to the wall and rape her. These congested the long-distance grid with phony transactions so that California couldn't get enough electricity when it needed it. There wasn't a technical problem. If you don't believe this, look at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (a group with strong deregulation bias) reports on the California crisis. And if you don't believe them, just quit reading now.

Saying that barring Enron, the crisis wouldn't have occured, and it's the fault of the regulators is like saying barring icebergs, the Titanic wouldn't have sunk, and it was the fault of the shipbuilders.

After the blackout, the search for a scapegoat could easily go awry. Electricity won't ever be deregulated. The real issue isn't between "the market" and "regulation," because the danger of bad regulation is at least as great as that of bad market behavior. What we ought to seek is an intelligent balance of government regulation and market flexibility.

Absolutely. That's why you could buy stock in power companies before deregulation. It wouldn't light a fire under the market, but it would be a steady performer. And that's what we need to go back to, because we've found that the alternative we made just doesn't work.

Popular posts from this blog

New post-convention poll Results look good to me. Now, we have to keep them coming. Further down in the article, there is discussion of how Kerry is gaining ground as a person who understands the needs of people, and a person of character. Key problem is going to be keeping these issues in front of voters, when the Kerry campaign will have a finite amount of cash to campaign on. Bush won't have a finite amount until the Republican convention at the end of August. Other people are going to have to step up and start hammering the Bush administration. Kerry Leads Bush in Post-Convention Poll (washingtonpost.com) : The new poll shows Kerry now claims the support of 50 percent of all registered voters, compared with 44 percent for Bush, with independent candidate Ralph Nader at 2 percent. On the eve of the convention, Bush led Kerry 48 percent to 46 percent. Among those most likely to vote, the race is tighter: Kerry holds a 2-point advantage over Bush in the current po...
Read more
Sometimes headlines just write themselves Like this one from the Washington Post today: Ex-FEMA Head Starts Disaster Planning Firm Michael Brown certainly has shown he can plan a disaster. Look at how awful Hurricane Katrina was. For preventing or fixing things afterwards, he's not so good.
Read more
Reading List It is a good thing to be married to a librarian. Our local system has a web-accessable catalog where I can put a book on hold. Depending on how many people are waiting for the book, in a few days to a few months, my wife comes home with the book I've requested. I was reading "A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market" by John Allen Paulos. It is the kind of book that makes mathematics of investing accessable to non-mathematical types (and some of us mathematical folks as well), even as he tells the story of his failed love affair with Worldcom stock. Of course, I set this aside as soon as I got in "Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth" by Joe Conason. This book takes all of the distortions of the right-wing media, the Bush-Cheney administration, and the Republican "conventional wisdom", and proceeds to refute them, citing facts chapter and verse. I think this book is great. But I've g...
Read more