Nader and the Republicans


Eric Alterman and Salon Magazine are both doing a good job of covering the ego trip that is the Nader campaign. I'll stay away from that, and address another salient point. Is it right for the Republicans to be trying to get him on the ballot? I have a friend who is a small-c conservative, and he says no.

I did my usual thought experiment, and thought about how I would feel if it was Perot, and prominent Democratic activists were trying to get him on the ballot to split the Republican vote. The thing is, some Democrats did go over to support Perot, though more Republicans did. I have no question that they shared Perot's neo-populist views. They also voted for him in the general election.

Let's contrast this with Nader's Republican backers. They don't share his views on anything, from gay marriage to controlling corporate interests in government to the War in Iraq. They also will not be voting for him. They only want him to split the left, and don't really care how its done. That's the difference between the Perot and the Nader races, and why the Republican support is immoral.

If the Democrats started trying to get Judge Roy "I want my Ten Commandments" Moore on the ballot in all fifty states, and had the money to pull it off, imagine the vitriol and bile that would be poured onto it by the Republicans. Granted, it would be hilarious watching the Right wing trying to disavow it's Far-Right wingnuts while simultaneously courting their votes. It also would expose the Republicans *nudge, nudge, wink,wink* stances on race relations and other social wedge issues. And the entertainment value of that alone might be worth it.

Popular posts from this blog

New post-convention poll Results look good to me. Now, we have to keep them coming. Further down in the article, there is discussion of how Kerry is gaining ground as a person who understands the needs of people, and a person of character. Key problem is going to be keeping these issues in front of voters, when the Kerry campaign will have a finite amount of cash to campaign on. Bush won't have a finite amount until the Republican convention at the end of August. Other people are going to have to step up and start hammering the Bush administration. Kerry Leads Bush in Post-Convention Poll (washingtonpost.com) : The new poll shows Kerry now claims the support of 50 percent of all registered voters, compared with 44 percent for Bush, with independent candidate Ralph Nader at 2 percent. On the eve of the convention, Bush led Kerry 48 percent to 46 percent. Among those most likely to vote, the race is tighter: Kerry holds a 2-point advantage over Bush in the current po...
Read more
Sometimes headlines just write themselves Like this one from the Washington Post today: Ex-FEMA Head Starts Disaster Planning Firm Michael Brown certainly has shown he can plan a disaster. Look at how awful Hurricane Katrina was. For preventing or fixing things afterwards, he's not so good.
Read more
Reading List It is a good thing to be married to a librarian. Our local system has a web-accessable catalog where I can put a book on hold. Depending on how many people are waiting for the book, in a few days to a few months, my wife comes home with the book I've requested. I was reading "A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market" by John Allen Paulos. It is the kind of book that makes mathematics of investing accessable to non-mathematical types (and some of us mathematical folks as well), even as he tells the story of his failed love affair with Worldcom stock. Of course, I set this aside as soon as I got in "Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth" by Joe Conason. This book takes all of the distortions of the right-wing media, the Bush-Cheney administration, and the Republican "conventional wisdom", and proceeds to refute them, citing facts chapter and verse. I think this book is great. But I've g...
Read more